We started our journey by testing rFactor 2, a simulator that has commonly been blamed for poor performance for the level of graphics shown. Although Studio 397 has improved the simulator in the last years, it is still a title that costs a lot to run at full graphic fidelity and it will be a good first test for our SLI. Will we be able to finally conquer rFactor 2 in ultra? If you have seen the video above, you will get an idea, but there are many things to test. Before we take action, let’s take a look at the starting situation:
rFactor 2:
First test, first issues. rFactor 2 does not have native SLI support, which means that the development team does not recommend its use or work to improve performance. However, a lot of games, simulators or not, work perfectly with SLI in spite of not having support. The problem is that it will be the user who will have to make his own life to configure his equipment and he will not receive any kind of official help, neither from the creator of the game, nor from Nvidia. In this case, we can see that if we load rF2 with the default profile, the simulator only uses one of the two graphic cards.
Luckily, the rFactor 2 community has managed to give, based on what surely have been dozens of hours of testing, the right configuration for SLI, and they have been kind enough to share it with the web. To change the SLI configuration we must download a program called Nvidia Inspector. Motorist users will know it because it’s the only way to apply antialiasing correctly to the simulator since a couple of years ago. Once downloaded and opened, we must load the rFactor 2 profile and make the following changes:
This last setting, although is strange, is what forces the second card to run at full speed as well. It is not clear if it is a problem of the Nvidia driver or of rFactor 2, but Virtual reality pre-rendered frames must be set to 2 in order to use SLI to its full potential. It can also be changed from the Nvidia Control Panel if you prefer. It should look something like this:
With this, we have rFactor 2 ready to run with SLI. So let’s get the testing started.
1080p
Well, we’re off to a good start. From the cockpit to 1080p, not only do we not gain performance, but we lose it. And the gains from the TV camera aren’t enough to launch rockets either. What’s going on here? It happens that our 7700K is the limiting factor. At the ultra graphics level, the i7 is not capable of producing more than 150 FPS on average, and it doesn’t even fully utilize a 1080Ti. Adding another one, far from improving performance, makes it worse by having an extra step of communication between the two graphics cards, which are only being used at 40% each. When we switch to the TV view, which is capable of using a 100% 1080Ti, we see a slight increase in FPS but again we hit the limits of the i7, even overclocked at 5GHz, which is unable to use two 1080Ti with all its potential. Let’s see what happens in a more normal scenario:
As we can see, we are facing the same situation. From the cockpit, the performance is worse, and from the TV camera we get a significant improvement this time, but still below what was invested. It should be noted that disabling Hyperthreading and turning the i7 into an i5 has no effect on performance, so we can conclude that rF2 does not know how to use more than 4 cores and therefore will not benefit from a Ryzen 7 or 9, or one of the new i7 or i9. This is the most you can expect from a processor in rF2 today.
Conclusions 1080p:
1440p
We increase the resolution and… well, this is something else! From the cockpit we see that we are still limited by the processor, but we keep perfect FPS for 120/144Hz. When we switch to the TV view we see the SLI glow for the first time. 60% to 90% magnification! This resolution in that kind of view puts the focus on graphics power, and here we get, for the same price, a much higher performance than a 2080Ti would give. Let’s see what happens when the cars disperse:
Good news, again. The improvements are starting to be substantial. We can maintain the 144Hz from the cockpit, which with Gsync is a wonder, and from the TV camera we get a 60% increase to the average FPS. There are some drops, in places where the processor can’t take it anymore, but the average is above the 144FPS target in both situations. Again, we improved by far to a 2080Ti with the same investment.
Conclusions 1440p:
SLI is worth maintaining a strong 120/144Hz
1080Ti SLI substantially better than 2080Ti
A single 1080Ti would perfectly maintain 90Hz at all times
1080 down would limit us to 60Hz
4K DSR
Let’s go with 4K, where things get interesting. A second card here gives us about 60% extra performance. At this resolution the gains with SLI occur in all situations, since the limitation is the graphic power and our 7700K can work comfortably. In 4K we again substantially exceed what a 2080Ti would offer and we can always stay above 60Hz. What’s more, from the cockpit, even a 120Hz 4K screen would make sense. Let’s see when things calm down:
As you might expect, we have even better results. Gains of up to 70%, with a spectacular 175 FPS on average from the cockpit. While doing the tests, I saw over 200 FPS in some parts of the circuit from that view. With this configuration a 4K 120Hz screen would be a very good option to consider, if you have Gsync or Freesync. We could drive at about 175FPS on average and then watch the replays with all the ultra without ever going below 60FPS. Sync would make the experience totally seamless.
But maybe the most interesting thing is the triple 1080p theme. If we take into account that the amount of pixels is more or less in the middle between 1440p and 4K, we can expect around 150 FPS on average with everything in ultra. With a 1080Ti we could maintain 60 FPS without problems, but with SLI we could have a three screen configuration at 144Hz with Freesync or Gsync without sacrificing anything, with an impressive latency and fluidity.
A triple 1440p configuration at 60Hz also makes sense. It would mean a 33% increase in pixels, so from the cockpit we would theoretically have a performance of around 70 to 90 FPS. The repeats, however, would be difficult to run in ultra, with an estimated performance of about 40 FPS. On the other hand, it seems that the time of the triple 4K has not yet arrived and it would be a configuration that would force us to lower the graphics a lot to make it work.
4K conclusions
Final conclusions
SLI in rFactor 2 works very well once the profile is set up with Nvidia Inspector, especially considering that it has no official support. You can check it yourself in the video that heads this article. We are not going to consider the results at 1080p because, first, they are not the fault of a technology malfunction, but of the processor and the low resolution, and second, it would be a complete foolishness to buy two graphics cards of this caliber to play at 1080p. The results we have seen here would be repeated in any other game, simulator or not, at such low resolutions. Let’s look at some final data:
Two 1080Ti in SLI, on rFactor 2, are significantly better than a 2080Ti, and at the current second-hand price, much cheaper. Apart from the pure data, with Gsync activated, the experience is completely smooth and satisfactory. We do not appreciate sudden frame drops, nor the dreaded “stutter”, nor any adverse effects. It just works, and it does it very well. That’s why we will declare this first result as very satisfactory and money well spent.
See you at the next stop: Assetto Corsa.
See you on the track!
Note: This offer is available again. Since the almost standard settled in the Direct Drive…
Stepping into the world of iRacing, one of the most demanding simulators out there, can…
For sim racers, when things are going well, there is no better feeling. However, sim…
A few years ago, we talked about iRacing's educational videos to give us some basic…
The release date of is now just around the corner, and excitement is mounting for…
The Fanatec story related to its financial issues and executives members is taking another step…
View Comments
Nice article.
As someone still stuck with SLI (1080 Ti's) it's very nice when a game actually uses it, even if it requires some tweaking to get it working. I've used it with rFactor 2 for years.
It's a shame ACC doesn't want to work with SLI no matter how hard I try. :( The original Assetto Corsa does use it though so that's good, and also AMS2 although I'm not a fan of the physics in that game so I don't play it.
Thanks Craig!